For some time I've struggled with the ethics of eating meat. On the one hand, animals are certainly mistreated by big meat manufacturers. Cows are confined their entire lives in cages and force-fed hormones, chickens are crammed into pens and are deprived of their beaks, sows are forced to gestate until "unproductive" and then slaughtered. All of this is an unnatural industrialization of God's natural order.
On the other hand, I love a good barbecue. And I don't have an ethical problem with eating a pig or a cow, but I would like for them to at least have a chance to be a pig or a cow before their number comes up. I found this helpful article, which says this on the subject:
Those who claim that it is morally wrong for human beings to eat meat because it involves killing an animal must logically claim that predation itself -- in all contexts -- is evil. But predation is part of nature as created by God. If it were evil, even those who eat strict vegetarian diets of only organically grown foods would be guilty through association. Biological control of pests and diseases by definition requires predators, and healthy, life-sustaining soils are not possible without predation.
The human species should not apologize for its predatory role in the biotic pyramid. When the pyramid is functioning properly, nature is in harmony with itself. The disharmony comes when things get out of balance -- as when the mountain lost it wolves and was taken over by its deer. Therefore, the vision of lions lying down with lambs is a gross misunderstanding of harmony in nature; it assumes that harmony within nature, the biota, should be identical with harmony among humans.
The objection that predation may be a product of the fall and not the created order is unfortunately not taken up.
The most obvious solution--buying free-range, organic eggs and meat--has problems of its own. For every farm that claims to treat its animals humanely, there are screaming protests from the PETA folks that the free-range solution is no solution at all. After all, the animals must still be slaughtered, and that in slaughterhouses, those cathedrals of cruelty.
I think the solution, for now, is to eat meat sparingly, and to know as much as possible about the source of the meat. Is it possible that the animals are still mistreated? Yes, but it is less likely on a small, organic farm than in a big meat conglomerate.
Can I sleep soundly knowing that I may have been indirectly responsible for the suffering of a cow? Soundly enough. A stewardship ethic encourages responsible handling of God's resources, but not everything can be controlled. With people starving in Africa and gang warfare going on in the inner city, an overdeveloped interest in the day-to-day affairs of farm animals isn't indicated. Regarding the long-term health of my conscience, as long as there is sin in the world, I think I can responsibly take my chances.
Recent Comments